Sai Inspires – Prof. G. Venkarataman Guru Poornima Special Offering

(Daily Episode)

Part 4

PEACE CANNOT CO‐EXIST WITH SELFISHNESS!

It is only when the individual is prepared to sacrifice his selfish desires and toil for the welfare of society, that the nation will prosper. Then only will the world have peace. That is why the Vedas proclaim that man can have peace only when he renounces selfish desires. The Vedas express disapproval of persons who accumulate wealth and who are ever immersed in activities that can add to their physical comfort. The man who gives, receives even while he gives, more than what he gives.

REFLECTIONS

This quote is a very important one for the simple reason that almost 99% of people all over the world would hardly connect world peace with removal of selfishness. If you don’t accept that, you just have to look back at the famous Cold War period that lasted from about 1946 to 1991, that is to say, almost from the time World War II ended to the time when the huge erstwhile Soviet Union collapsed almost overnight and vanished into the dustbin of history. It was a period of tense eyeball‐to‐eyeball confrontation between America on the one hand and Soviet Union on the other, each with about ten thousand deadly nuclear weapons, each with an explosive power somewhere between 50 to 100 Hiroshima‐type atom bombs. It used to be said then the each of these two Super Powers could individually wipe out the whole of planet earth many times over.

It was an exceedingly tense period, especially since both Super Powers could shoot missiles that could travel across the planet in about 30 minutes. In other words, if nuclear war had broken out, it would all have been over in less than one hour, with hardly any real victor but lots of people simply wiped out, and 90% of the survivors exposed to deadly radiation and what not. Young people of today would hardly have any idea of what kind tension humanity went through. And let me tell you from personal experience that in the early sixties when we had the so‐called Cuban crisis, no one knew what was going to happen. If ever the world was on the brink of disaster, that was it. Luckily, the Cuban crisis got resolved thanks to two wise leaders, President Kennedy on the American side and Chairman Nikita Khrushchev of USSR. However, I shall not go into all that. My main reason for bringing all that history to your notice was to draw attention to the so‐called MAD principle on which peace was based by experts on both sides.

I guess most of you might not have heard about this MAD principle and so let me say a few words about it. Let me start with what MAD really meant; it was an acronym standing for Mutually Assured Destruction. In practical terms, the two sides maintained a tense peace by silently telling each other: “Listen! Don’t you dare any funny stuff! We have hundreds of missiles each equipped with many deadly bombs; and they can reach you in between 20 to 30 minutes. We can launch from land and from sea, all over the place. So, though you may hit us badly, you too would get the same treatment!” This was the way the generals on the two sides warned each other. The politicians then took the soft approach and said, “Look, we really cannot take things that far. So let us maintain some kind of peace, without going that far.”

That about describes it; there was no real peace but just a tense situation; mercifully though, no bombs flying. Can that BP‐raising situation be really called peace? Obviously not. What then would be real peace like? The answer to that lies in Swami’s quote. So, let us try to go deeper into it. We start with conflict. Have you ever seriously wondered why at all a conflict arises? The answer is simple. Conflict usually arises between two people A and B say, when one of them tries to take away what both have. Or else, it could be that both A and B do not have the desired whatever it is, say a powerful political position, but are competing fiercely for it. For example, A and B could be two women, a daughter‐in‐law and her mother‐in‐law, both competing to be the prime individual in the life of the man in the middle, husband to A and son to B. This of course is an old, old story, and is known all over the world. Though the time and place might vary, the cause of conflict is the same ‐ a kind of selfishness.

In the familiar example just cited, the conflict is confined to the family. What Swami is referring to concerns selfishness of individuals impacting the entire country. Let me give a simple but powerful example. India has a big drug industry which makes all kinds of drugs. Indeed, where generic drugs are concerned, India has a strong reputation particularly, after President Clinton gave the lead in picking India as a leading supplier of generic drugs for treating HIV positive patients in Africa. At the same time, sad to say, we also have a huge fake drug industry. What I mean is that unscrupulous operators make packaging almost identical to that in which genuine drugs are packed. The fakers buy these duplicate, look‐alike packaging and fill the bottles, ampoules or whatever with just plain liquid, tablet or powder as the case may be, and sell it to small scale drug dealers, like those you find in small towns, including Puttaparthi.

Now here is my point. Take a life‐saving drug. A lady is having a serious medical condition and a doctor has been called. He examines the patient and says, “I want this medicine immediately. It has to be administered at once.” The son of this lady rushes to the nearest drug store and buys the medicine. Unfortunately, the drug he buys is a fake and as a result his mother dies. The fakers may make huge profits, and believe me, they in fact do. I have read somewhere that the WHO estimates that nearly 30% of the drugs sold in the Third World are spurious. Just imagine the large scale havoc caused. The magnitude of this bogus industry is so huge, and poor countries have so little infrastructure for checking the drugs sold, that ordinary people in hundreds of thousands are subject to unwanted suffering and even death, after paying for the drugs. This is an example of how selfishness and the greed to make money by hook or crook can cause national havoc.

Let us dig a bit deeper. How come these people who make fake drugs are so heartless? In part it probably is due to the fact they were not at all exposed to values at home or in school. In fact, there is a kind of feedback loop here. When children don’t get exposed to values at home and school, can easily slip in later years, little realising how much harm he or she is doing. As the number of people who are indifferent to moral values increases, there comes a tipping point when society as a whole starts adopting an indifferent attitude. That’s when ripples turn into big waves.

Here is an example. India has a very large number of trucks, many of them owned by small and medium size trucking companies. They want to maximize profits and so the first thing Venkataraman they do is to use trucks that ought to have been junked a long time ago. The headlights hardly work, the brakes are not in order, the reflectors on the rear side have fallen off and so on. Next, they invariably overload the truck, that means they can easily trip over. As if this is not enough, they hire drivers who drive badly; some of them don’t even have proper licenses. It is not as if there are no rules; but practically every rule on the book can be got around by paying a bribe somewhere or the other. Turning now to the drivers, they often drink while driving which they are not supposed to, and drive in the middle of the road instead of in the lane they are supposed to, and cross the speed limit. Also, they hardly ever dip their lights when traffic comes from the other side.

I guess you are seeing where I am going. What we have here is an entire chain of selfishness, and the net result is that in some places traffic accident is the number one killer. Can you imagine that? Not cancer, TB, heart attack and so but road accidents! And why do these accidents happen? Simply because of cumulative selfishness.

So, you see if people decide to get selfish, then such selfishness would start growing without limits. Further, if selfishness starts spreading like a deadly virus, then it can affect large segments of society and cause harm on a large scale. This would somewhat be similar to a body in which cancer has spread; and you know what the end result of that is. Where society is concerned, it does not quite die but becomes very sick and in the extreme case fails. To become a failed state is the worst fate for a nation. Today, there is one universally acknowledged failed state, namely Somalia, with many others on the brink of tottering.

From a spiritual point of view, God sends the human being with a body, a Mind and the soul or Atma. As Krishna has said and Swami has explained in detail, it is the duty of the body and the Mind to safely take the Atma back to God. If the Mind and body gang up and act selfishly, then it means that humans have massively failed the purpose of life. Do we want to let down God that way, especially when we constantly proclaim, “WE LOVE YOU SWAMI!”? Think about it!

Part 5

DHARMA IS MUCH MORE THAN ROUTINE ETHICS

Men regard Dharma (right conduct) as merely ethical conduct in daily life. But this is not so. Dharma really means recognition of the Universal Consciousness that is in each individual and act on the basis of the unity of that Consciousness. When this Consciousness in man is enveloped in the ego, it assumes the form of three gunas or attributes (Satwa, Rajas, Tamas). When the Divine nature of this Consciousness is realized, it is transformed into Atma Dharma ‐ the Dharma of the Self. True Dharma is the realization of the unity of the Omni‐Self.

–        Divine Discourse, November 23rd, 1986.

REFLECTIONS

Sai Ram. I would like to begin by drawing attention to two specific words in the opening line of this Sai quote; they are 1) Dharma and 2) ethics. The word Dharma is one of the five we commonly hear as human values namely, Sathya, Dharma, Santhi, Prema, Ahimsa. Though referred to as human values they are actually Divine in origin, and that is the first fact we ought to be clear about.

What do I mean by saying Sathya, Dharma, etc., are Divine in origin? Basically the following. Now God in the ultimate is nameless, formless and is supposed to be without attributes, there are in fact attributes latent in God. Indeed, every religion proclaims God as the most compassionate one. If compassion was not latent in God, how would He show it to a devotee who is in deep trouble and prays intensely for help?

OK, we agree that latent in God are many attributes. What are they? There are many, but five that readily come to mind are indeed Sathya, Dharma, Santhi, Prema, and Ahimsa. Further, when God incarnates in human form, He manifests these attributes all the time, in some manner or the other. We all know that Rama was the embodiment of Sathya and Dharma and of course the others as well; the same was true of Krishna, and currently, we all adore Swami as the embodiment of Prema.

So, God not only has certain values latent in Him but also makes them patent, especially when He comes down in human form. Fine, and we can now appreciate why Sathya, Dharma, etc., ought to be called Divine in origin. But why are they called human values? Because God expects humans to exhibit those same values in life; indeed, He expects that during their entire life, humans would put these values always on display. By the way, that exactly is why Swami often reminds us: YOUR LIFE SHOULD BE MY MESSAGE. Which makes abundantly clear that all of us ought to live our lives strongly adhering to Sathya and Dharma every moment of our lives.

So far, we have not brought the word ethics into the picture. Now what exactly is 'ethics'? The dictionary defines the word as: 'Moral principles that govern a person's or group's behaviour. It is quite possible that historically, ethics and morality meant the same thing, that is to say, adherence to ethics also meant strictly following Dharma. Over a period of time, however, in the Western world, ethics has come to mean socially accepted set of codes and norms regarding behaviour. And since socially acceptable practices and behaviour change with time, so do ethical standards.

You see this, for example, in the movies. I do not know how it is these days, but way back in the fifties; for example, every single movie produced for commercial distribution had to be first certified by a film board of censors. The censors had a strict code and movie producers always tried to stay around the edge of the code, getting stuff past the censors, if they could get away with it. From what I gather, current standards are so different, that so‐called sleazy stuff of the past would be regarded today as absolutely saintly! The point I am making is simply that the code of ethics is elastic and varies with time and the attitude of the society concerned. Moral values on the other hand, are immutable, since virtue which is the practical manifestation of moral values in action, is Divine in nature and origin.

In short, Dharma means much more than ethics. Based on this, one could draw up a rule book that says: Following Dharma means that thou shalt do this, this, and this, etc., followed by another set of rules that clearly draws red lines saying that thou shalt NOT do this, this, and this, etc. Now this is the beautiful and subtle message of Swami, and needs very careful attention. Bhagawan says, effectively:

O man! Dharma is not merely a rule with green and red lines. Dharma is the very Nature of God, and in as much as God is Consciousness itself – remember, the scriptures declare that God is verily Consciousness, Prajnanam Brahma! – you can claim to be following Dharma only if you recognize the presence of Consciousness everywhere, in everything, all the time!

If you think about it, that declaration raises the bar for Dharmic behaviour rather high. In other words, whatever we do, we must make sure that our actions do not hurt any being, for God is in that being. It must not harm society, for society is God. It must not harm Nature, for Nature is God, and it must not go against our own Conscience, for Conscience is the Ultimate Master of each and every one of us!

Swami makes this clear by adding [effectively of course]:

O man! As long as you remain bound by the gunas, you would also have some kind of prejudice, dislike, tendency to become angry, jealous, greedy, selfish, etc.

All such negativity binds you and chains you from strictly following Dharma in the sense I have defined. So, if you truly wish to be Dharmic, then follow the golden rules:

•          Rise above the gunas. This won’t happen in a day, but keep trying and trying hard.

•          See God everywhere and all the time, so that all of your actions become pleasing to God.

•          And never go against your Conscience, since Conscience is verily God!

That is essentially what Swami is telling us, and that is the essence of the quote we started with.

These days, Spirituality has been reduced to a seemingly simple drill. Just say, “I love you Swami,” and everything gets taken care of. At least a large number of people believe so. All this is happening because most people choose to ignore the fine print and tune the definition to suit their own, particular convenience. Swami is reminding us that that action alone is Dharmic, which pleases God. Thus, pleasing God doesn't mean merely doing what we like and shouting, “WE LOVE YOU SWAMI!” It means paying careful attention to what Swami is telling us and following them as strictly as possible in daily life.

Think about it!

Part 6

NO ONE IS EXEMPT FROM SATHYA AND DHARMA

The Truths proclaimed in the Upanishads ‐ Sathya and Dharma (Truth and Righteousness) ‐have to be practiced by everyone irrespective of caste or community. The practice of good conduct is the natural duty of man. You should realize that the happiness of individuals is dependent on the welfare of the society as a whole. The transformation of the individual is a prerequisite for the transformation of the world. Together with changes in the political, social and economic spheres, we need transformation in the mental and spiritual spheres. Without such transformation all other changes are of no use. Therefore, make your actions pure. Only then can the human rise to the level of the Divine.

–          Divine Discourse, July 28, 1992.

REFLECTIONS

This is one of those quotes where Swami connects individual behaviour and society. I do not know how many of you have taken a stroll through the small garden in front of the college building in Brindavan. If you have, you might have noticed many stone slabs with Swami’s sayings painted on them. One of them says, as best as I can remember, without individual character, there is no national character. The above quote, basically underscores that one important and most crucial point.

You may not believe it but sixty odd years ago, corruption was not all that common. These days it has not only become common and global but what is worse, people seem to accept it as a part of life. This is not only wrong but utterly dangerous. It is because corruption has become global that we have organisations like Transparency International that give rankings to countries on the basis of how corrupt the country is.

Now corruption is a very serious matter, far more serious than people realize. It is not something to read about in newspapers and then ignore. To do so would be as stupid as a patient ignoring the warning given by his doctor that he has cancer and that he had better rush to get it treated.

These days, corruption is so widespread that many people shake their head and mutter, “Listen, this evil is too far gone; nobody can stop it.” Strangely, that statement is both true and false. You might wonder what kind of nonsense is that. Well, let me tell you it is NOT nonsense, and here is my point.

I do not know how many of you are aware of the history of World War II. One important event in that was the Battle of Stalingrad that took place between August 1942 to February 1943, between Hitler’s army and the Soviet troops. Hitler had superior arms, lots of tanks and that kind of stuff. But his troops found the Russian winter too severe and could not fight at their best. The Soviets had inferior arms but what happened was that almost all the people of Stalingrad rose to join the Soviet troops and give a fight to the Germans. So it came to a fight between a very large number of people who were ill‐equipped but determined to keep the enemy out of their country by fighting to the bitter end, and a small, well‐equipped army but with rather demoralized troops. In the end, the Germans army was stopped and forced to retreat, rather like what Napoleon was forced to do about a century or so earlier. In fact, this was a major turning point in the war.

OK, that was a nice history lesson but what has it got to do with corruption, and the Swami quote in the beginning? Simply this:

•          When the enemy is strong, people must join together to fight the enemy.

•          They must be solidly determined to push the enemy back, come what may, and that is what the Russians did.

•          It was not merely the Russian army but the people of Stalingrad who together threw the Germans out.

•          In all such cases, a heavy price may have to be paid. Where the battle of Stalingrad is concerned, about 2 million people perished.

If I were to paraphrase all of the above, it would simply translate as below:

If the objective to be attained is very precious, then one must be ready to pay any price to achieve it. In particular, one must be ready to sacrifice any amount. Above all, the enemy being powerful, can be defeated only if all people decide to come together.

Now curiously, whenever there is an external enemy as always happens in war, people unite easily; it has always happened in history. But when the enemy is internal, such unity is rare. That really is the problem. Let us keep this in mind and examine why people merely complain about corruption and hardly do anything about it.

If you think about the problem of corruption, the enemy is greed, individual greed. Individual greed can and often does disrupt social systems and when such disruption becomes widespread, there is a national problem. Here is a simple example. It is not uncommon for people who want to become truck drivers to get a driving license, even if they are bad drivers and are totally ignorant about road rules. How do they get the license?By giving a bribe of course. When you have tens of thousands of such unqualified drivers, driving badly maintained vehicles, on bad roads at night, it is no great surprise there are any number of roadside accidents, many of which lead to death. I believe that currently, with over 130,000 deaths per year, India leads the world in traffic deaths, overtaking even China. America has lots more vehicles on the road and yet where traffic deaths are concerned, India leads; what a dubious distinction!

So, you see, there is a loop here. Individual greed starts spreading and causes harm on a large scale. And that problem can flow back and impact individuals. Thus, when bad drivers are all over the place, innocent people can and do get killed, often for no fault of theirs. I think you can get the picture I am trying to present. Before I close, let me correct a major wrong impression that has been created that corruption is connected solely with passing money under the table to getting things done illegally. That might be the legal interpretation, but if one looks from a moral point of view, creating a wrong impression and tempting people to do things that are bad for them, all for the same of making a fast buck is equally deplorable. If you ask where is corruption here, I would say it is connected with the corruption of the mind.

The business world indulges in this all the time. Look at the ads for fast foods. These days, fast foods have become such an addiction that in some countries as much as 60% of the people are obese; this has serious national consequences, as everyone knows. Similarly, seductive ads that promote drinking and smoking are equally harmful to society as a whole. It might be legal according to laws written by man; but there is an over‐riding law, the moral law that is transcendental. It is not the law written by man but the moral law dictated by Conscience that decides what is Sathya and what is asathya, what is Dharma and what is adharma. No one from king to pauper is exempt from Sathya and Dharma. It is when a majority start taking Sathya and Dharma seriously that we shall truly see a transformation of society, an outcome all of us dearly want but hardly bother to support via our commitment to moral imperatives.